You go in there and read a few of Vanity Fairs articles, only to find yourself bombarded with one article after the other of immature, childishely written hit pieces against those interviewed or spoken of. You're left with the feeling they've hired a bunch of common core-educated college age children fresh out of high school to cover these stories. Zero talent = zero entertainment. So, unless you're willing to risk losing a few neurons, then don't dare to enter. You might come out alive, but less intelligent than before you entered. Unless you're into National Enquirer type gossipy gossip, leave Vanity Fair to the high drama addicted, soap opera type readers. Tip for consumers:This review is based on articles read via free access to Vanity Fairs website.I admit it--I at one point in my life had a subscription to Vanity Fair. Sure the magazine is often filled with silly gossip about wealthy people (see: Behind the Hamptons Hedges) and about a million pages of ads. But, I contend, it still has excellent authors writing about interesting topics, which makes it worth reading. For example, there are many thoughtful articles by Sebastian Junger: http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/sebastian-junger And recently by Christopher Hitchens: http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2010/09/hitchens-******* http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2010/06/hitchens-******* It used to be that VanityFair.com did not let you see much, but that has all changed and you can view a lot of the content for free. I realize it's not always art, but I do enjoy a little Vanity Fair in my life.I guess I thought your magazine was informative and one to read. Now, I see you have gotten political which is ridiculous. I hope you loose more subscriptions and I'll never look at it.Too far left for me to enjoy, it's disgusting. Talked about a skewed opinion. I won't renew my subscription. Typical DEM rag.One if their titles said that Donald Trump will serve 136 years but NOOOOOo as he says "FAKE NEWS!" The amount of years he is actually serving is not known yet they clickbaited me and then said he "could" serve 136 years. I HATE VANIRY FARMMM THEY LIEEDDDD LIARRRSSSS liare DO NOT LIe ON YIUR TITLES PLWASEEE. I actually thought he was going to go to jial for 136 yearsss but NOOOO! I had a VeRYyy berryyy bad ezperience on their site Tip for consumers:It wouldve bebe helpful to know That they are LIARS and only want your clicks for AD REEVENUE and will do That by spreading FAKE NEWSS!!. i wish I colad go back To the pasta and convince myself ro never click that site so I wouldnt be giving them money through ad revenueA newspaper with Sophistication and fun - topics are meticulously worked out. Exciting, inspiring vivid design. Service ValueGraydon Carter was a brilliant Editor. Under his supervision, the magazine offered rich stories, fantastic pieces, exciting and provocative stories. Is there any hope Vanity Fair changes its Editor to someone who actually knows about a Magazine. Under Ms. Jones, Vanity Fair became lame, boring and stupid. She doesn't know what she is doing in the magazine. She pretends she knows her job. But she is not a goof fit. Tip for consumers:Change the Editor in Chief of Vanity Fair. Value Shipping QualityLove the magazine. However I find the color of the photos on the cover are darker than before. And the cover of Sept 2023 is really not the best. Do not see the reason why Riley Keough had to sit with her legs wide open. Not very classy. Thanks Service Value Shipping Quality